< iLCSS UMD

Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Computational Social Science (iLCSS)

 


Social Networks



In an environment where readers react on real time to publications, how should editors decide the editorial line of their news organizations? In this article, we consider a model where readers ``vote'' on social media by embedding links to traditional media and where journalists modify their news content to maximize readership. Following an extensive literature on spatial models of voting, we show that quality outlets should concentrate on salient issues and editorialize their news to approximate the ideological preferences of users who assign the highest reputation scores to its products.

Low quality outlets, we show, are crowded out to more marginal ideological locations and to more marginal issues. Our results provide a general theory to describe how new technologies shape the editorial decisions of news organizations.


Publications


In an environment where readers react on real time to publications, how should editors decide the editorial line of their news organizations? In this article, we consider a model where readers ``vote'' on social media by embedding links to traditional media and where journalists modify their news content to maximize readership. Following an extensive literature on spatial models of voting, we show that quality outlets should concentrate on salient issues and editorialize their news to approximate the ideological preferences of users who assign the highest reputation scores to its products. Low quality outlets, we show, are crowded out to more marginal ideological locations and to more marginal issues. Our results provide a general theory to describe how new technologies shape the editorial decisions of news organizations.
Presented at APSA, 2018

In social media, sharing posts exposes a larger number of users to the preferred content of their peers. As users select or discard content, they collectively highlight facets of events or issues as to promote a particular interpretation. This article describes how social media users frame political events by selectively sharing content that is cognitively congruent with their beliefs. We model cognitive dissonance modeling time-to-retweet and exemplify the proposed theory with a study of recent protest events in Argentina.
In Journal of Communication, 2018

Twitter data are becoming an important part of modern political science research, but key aspects of the inner workings of Twitter streams as well as self-censorship on the platform require further research. A particularly important research agenda is to understand removal rates of politically charged tweets. In this article, I provide a strategy to understand removal rates on Twitter, particularly on politically charged topics. First, the technical properties of Twitter's API that may distort the analyses of removal rates are tested. Results show that the forward stream does not capture every possible tweet ┬▒between 2 and 5 percent of tweets are lost on average, even when the volume of tweets is low and the firehose not needed. Second, data from Twitter's streams are collected on contentious topics such as terrorism or political leaders and non-contentious topics such as types of food. The statistical technique used to detect uncommon removal rate patterns is multilevel analysis. Results show significant differences in the removal of tweets between different topic groups. This article provides the first systematic comparison of information loss and removal on Twitter as well as a strategy to collect valid removal samples of tweets.
In PLOS One, 2018